The landscape of healthcare compliance continues to evolve rapidly, especially in light of ongoing challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and shifting regulatory expectations. This comprehensive overview addresses critical questions raised during the recent webinar on the 2024 Compliance Benchmark Survey, providing clarity on best practices, regulatory expectations, and strategic approaches for compliance professionals navigating this complex environment.

—

Continuing Challenges in Healthcare Compliance Post-Pandemic

The recent survey underscores persistent issues within compliance programs stemming from the pandemic’s disruptions. Many organizations still grapple with workforce instability, including high turnover rates and reluctance among staff to return to in-person work settings. During COVID-19, compliance officers faced unprecedented retirements—twice the usual rate—which has led to significant staffing shortages that are slow to resolve. To bridge these gaps, many organizations are increasingly relying on part-time consultants or external contractors to maintain compliance oversight, especially for investigative activities where onsite presence is limited. These staffing challenges highlight the importance of flexible resource management and strategic planning in maintaining effective compliance programs.

Reporting Structures and Their Implications

The structure of compliance reporting lines significantly impacts program independence and effectiveness. When compliance officers report through legal counsel, it can create conflicts that undermine their ability to identify and disclose issues freely. Regulatory guidance from entities like the DOJ and OIG emphasizes the importance of direct reporting to the CEO, ensuring the compliance function remains independent and free from undue influence. Having a compliance officer under legal counsel may hinder their role as an unbiased investigator and could lead to conflicts of interest, especially if the same legal party is responsible for both legal defense and compliance oversight. For further insights into organizational structures, see from molecules to market the new era of pharmaceutical visualization.

Conducting Effective Program Evaluations

Regular, independent assessments of compliance programs are crucial for demonstrating effectiveness to regulators. While ongoing monitoring by compliance staff is necessary, it does not replace the value of periodic, independent evaluations. Typically, organizations should aim for comprehensive reviews every three years, supplemented by annual internal assessments. Engaging external experts can provide unbiased insights, especially when onboarding new compliance officers, as these evaluations help identify strengths and areas for improvement. Such evaluations are vital in establishing a credible compliance posture that aligns with regulatory expectations.

Internal vs. External Compliance Assessments

Internal evaluations, including self-assessment checklists and surveys, are standard practice but are often viewed as biased or self-serving by external authorities. Internal assessments are useful for ongoing monitoring, but their credibility is limited without independent verification. To demonstrate compliance program effectiveness convincingly, organizations should consider external audits or evaluations conducted by independent professionals. This approach aligns with best practices suggested by industry standards, ensuring that compliance measures withstand regulatory scrutiny.

Staffing Shortages and Use of Consultants

Given the lengthy hiring processes and remote work challenges, contracting compliance consultants as interim or designated officers has become a practical solution. These professionals can step in immediately, offering specialized expertise without the overhead costs associated with full-time employees. Engaging such external resources allows organizations to maintain compliance oversight, address staffing gaps swiftly, and avoid the risks of prolonged leadership vacancies. Learn more about the evolving role of visual tools in healthcare at revolutionizing modern medicine with XR.

Reliability of Employee Surveys

While internal employee compliance surveys are valuable tools for monitoring organizational culture, their results often lack credibility with external regulators. Many surveys are not professionally validated, and employees may distrust the motives behind them, fearing retaliation or questioning anonymity. As a result, these surveys are less persuasive as evidence of a compliant culture. Utilizing validated, third-party-administered assessments can provide more credible insights into compliance health and cultural readiness.

Evidence of Effective Compliance Programs

Regulators like the DOJ prioritize tangible, external evidence when evaluating compliance effectiveness. Reliance solely on internally generated reports or self-assessments is insufficient and may be viewed skeptically. Demonstrating compliance success requires independent audits, external assessments, or third-party evaluations that provide unbiased validation of program effectiveness. Such evidence is essential to withstand regulatory scrutiny and support continuous improvement efforts.

Navigating Regulatory Risks Amid Changing Laws

Responding swiftly to new laws and regulations remains a top concern among compliance professionals. The dynamic legal landscape, especially in heavily regulated states like California and New York, imposes an ongoing burden to stay current. This challenge underscores the importance of proactive compliance strategies, including continuous education and leveraging technology to monitor regulatory updates—consider exploring innovations in healthcare visualizations from molecules to market.

Internal vs. External Management of Compliance Functions

Having a dedicated compliance leader is critical; internal personnel assuming temporary oversight without appropriate expertise risks gaps in leadership. Replacement periods exceeding six months can jeopardize program integrity, making external interim officers or consultants an attractive alternative. These external professionals bring immediate expertise, continuity, and objectivity—key factors in maintaining a robust compliance program during transitions.

Interesting:

Addressing Staffing Shortages Effectively

Organizations should prioritize strategic planning to manage staffing challenges, including re-evaluating project priorities, cross-training staff, and exploring outsourcing options such as engaging interns or external vendors. These measures help sustain compliance efforts without overburdening existing personnel, fostering resilience in compliance operations.

Cost-Effective Use of Temporary Compliance Leaders

Engaging interim compliance professionals can be a financially prudent approach, especially when compared to full-time staffing costs. External contractors offer flexibility, immediate availability, and specialized expertise, often at lower overhead costs. Structuring these engagements to include independent assessments can also provide leadership with a clear understanding of program status, facilitating a smoother transition to permanent staffing.

Internal Audit and Its Reporting Lines

For independence and objectivity, internal audit functions should ideally report directly to the Board’s Audit Committee rather than the CFO or Finance Department. Such reporting structures help prevent conflicts of interest, especially in financial reviews. Alternatively, integrating internal audit under the compliance department with direct reporting to the CEO and Board also supports independence—aligning with industry best practices.

Training and Communication Strategies

Beyond initial orientation and annual training, continuous education is vital. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) recommends developing annual training plans covering topics like the roles of compliance personnel, open communication channels, and non-retaliation policies. Targeted training tailored to high-risk areas—such as billing, coding, and patient interactions—should be conducted regularly, ensuring staff stay current with evolving healthcare regulations. For more insights into effective compliance education, visit revolutionizing modern medicine with XR.

Investigation Interviews and Oaths

Internal compliance investigations generally do not require placing individuals under oath, as these are administrative inquiries rather than legal proceedings. Law enforcement authorities have the legal authority to administer oaths and pursue legal actions for false statements. Internal investigators should focus on gathering facts without adopting law enforcement roles, maintaining a clear distinction between administrative and legal processes.

Sanction Screening Without SSN or DOB

Accurate identity verification during sanction screenings necessitates a unique identifier such as a Social Security Number, Tax ID, or professional license number. Relying solely on name, date of birth, or specialty is insufficient, as these can match multiple individuals. Proper identification ensures compliance with sanctions lists and helps prevent inadvertent violations.

Maturity of Healthcare Compliance Programs

The sophistication of a compliance program is less about its size and more about its structure, controls, and adherence to best practices. Factors include organizational complexity, service offerings, workforce characteristics, and operational locations. An effective program demonstrates accessible, well-followed policies, with evidence supporting legal and regulatory compliance.

Resources for General Compliance Questions

For broader guidance on healthcare compliance, consult reputable sources such as the Compliance FAQs, which offer valuable insights into common concerns and best practices.

—

For further insights on strengthening your compliance efforts, contact Richard Kusserow, CEO of Strategic Management Services, at compliance.com. Staying proactive and informed is essential for maintaining a resilient and effective compliance program in today’s ever-changing healthcare environment.