The landscape of healthcare liability has become increasingly intricate and challenging for providers across the industry. As medical malpractice risks evolve, organizations are exploring innovative approaches such as captive insurance to better manage their exposures. This shift is driven by rising claim severity, changing legal environments, and operational pressures, prompting healthcare entities to adopt more tailored, cost-effective risk financing solutions. Understanding these trends and the strategic role of captives is essential for organizations aiming to sustain financial stability and improve patient safety in a complex environment.

Managing Healthcare Liability Through Captives

Healthcare providers face a broad spectrum of liability risks, both traditional and emerging. Common exposures include medical malpractice, general liability, cyber-security threats, regulatory compliance challenges, workers’ compensation, and property damage. As the industry advances, new risks are gaining prominence—such as liabilities related to telehealth services, AI diagnostics, pandemic responses, supply chain disruptions, and reputational concerns fueled by social media scrutiny. The rapid adoption of digital health tools and innovative treatments has expanded liability exposures, making comprehensive risk management more vital than ever.

Many large hospital systems and physician groups are establishing captives to better control their risk profiles. These captive insurance companies—wholly owned subsidiaries designed to insure specific risks—provide a strategic alternative to traditional insurance markets. They enable healthcare organizations to customize coverage, align risk retention with organizational goals, and potentially realize long-term cost efficiencies. As Lori Gorman, deputy commissioner of the North Carolina Department of Insurance, explains, “Specifically in healthcare, we see many large systems forming captives to tailor their risk management strategies.”

Captives offer the flexibility to design programs that address unique organizational needs. They facilitate access to global reinsurance markets, support loss prevention initiatives, and promote data-driven decision-making. For instance, some healthcare captives directly fund patient safety measures, clinical risk audits, or staff training programs—efforts that can significantly reduce claim frequency and severity. Michael Maglaras, principal at Michael Maglaras & Company, notes that “healthcare liability risk has historically generated substantial premiums and claims, making captives an effective tool for managing these exposures.”

How Captives Help Address Today’s Healthcare Liability Challenges

Healthcare providers encounter multiple challenges—patient safety concerns, data security threats, regulatory compliance complexities, financial constraints, workforce issues, and operational inefficiencies. Addressing these requires a comprehensive risk management framework that incorporates proactive strategies such as continuous monitoring, staff education, and technological investments. For example, virtual care, robotic surgeries, and AI-powered diagnostics introduce new liabilities that captives are particularly well-equipped to underwrite.

The trend toward larger, integrated health systems further amplifies the appeal of captives. Consolidation results in bigger, more diverse risk pools, making captive structures attractive for managing multi-entity liabilities. Additionally, the rise in social inflation, class-action lawsuits, and punitive damages has increased the cost of liability coverage, even for providers with robust risk management practices. To illustrate, some institutions are moving cyber liability, physician malpractice, and other coverages into their captives to better control costs and tailor coverage.

Emerging risks, including ransomware attacks and the clinical use of psychedelic therapies, are also shaping the liability landscape. Captives can be expanded to cover these novel exposures, providing a customizable platform for managing complex risks. Bruce Whitmore of Willis Towers Watson emphasizes that “captives are increasingly used to cover property and medical stop-loss layers, reducing the volatility of total losses and improving financial predictability.”

Captive Insurance Structures in Healthcare

Healthcare organizations utilize various captive structures to meet their specific risk management needs. Larger entities often establish single-parent captives, which are wholly owned subsidiaries insuring the risks of their parent organization. These provide control over claims handling, risk financing, and loss prevention. Smaller organizations, or those seeking to pool risks, may opt for risk retention groups (RRGs)—which are formed under federal regulations to pool liability risks across similar entities.

Risk pooling arrangements are common for managing liability across multiple organizations, especially in sectors like long-term care or specialty clinics. While traditional group captives are more prevalent in other industries, healthcare providers sometimes collaborate through risk retention groups or joint ventures. “Hospitals pooling their risk can reduce individual exposure,” explains Joe Rosenberger, chief captive analyst at North Carolina Department of Insurance, “but they also share the risk of other participants’ claims.”

Cell captives, including protected cells and series structures, are gaining popularity among smaller or emerging healthcare organizations. These models offer lower startup costs and shared infrastructure, making them practical entry points into the captive space.

Captive Benefits in Addressing Healthcare Liability

Captives offer numerous benefits that help healthcare organizations address current liability challenges effectively:

Interesting:

  • Customized professional liability coverage: Captives enable organizations to insure high-severity and excluded risks, such as telehealth errors or AI-related liabilities, which many traditional insurers avoid.
  • Cost management in a competitive market: By retaining certain risks and accessing reinsurance directly, organizations can mitigate rising premiums and capacity constraints—particularly for cyber and pandemic-related exposures.
  • Policy flexibility and tailored language: Captives allow for the development of policies with specific contractual terms that align with evolving legal and regulatory landscapes.
  • Supporting enterprise risk management: Captives facilitate proactive initiatives like patient safety programs and compliance training, aligning risk financing with organizational safety goals.

Sara Brundage of Honigman LLP emphasizes that “captives provide healthcare providers the ability to customize insurance coverage to their unique risk profiles, often resulting in more favorable terms and cost savings.” They also reduce reliance on volatile commercial insurers, especially during market hardening periods, and have played a key role in expanding coverage during COVID-19 and other crises.

Leading Domiciles for Healthcare Liability Captives

Lloyd’s of London has historically been a major provider of healthcare liability coverage, especially for large, complex risks. Its longstanding relationships with the healthcare sector have fostered the growth of healthcare captives, with Lloyd’s writing approximately $600 million in such coverage in 2020.

Offshore domiciles like the Cayman Islands and Bermuda have become prominent for healthcare captives, offering favorable regulatory environments and large pools of reinsurance capacity. As of the third quarter of 2024, the Cayman Islands hosted 136 registered companies with $3.2 billion in premiums written for medical malpractice. US domiciles—including Vermont, North Carolina, and Utah—continue to serve as popular choices for domestic healthcare organizations seeking regulatory familiarity and proximity.

Phases of Managing Healthcare Liability Risk

Effective risk management in healthcare involves a structured, four-phase approach:

  • Risk Identification and Assessment: Evaluating exposures across clinical, legal, digital, and reputational domains. For example, virtual care programs and AI diagnostics require detailed risk analysis.
  • Risk Control and Prevention: Implementing policies, training, and technological safeguards. Cybersecurity measures and infection control protocols are vital in today’s environment.
  • Integration into Enterprise Risk Management (ERM): Embedding risk strategies into overall organizational planning ensures accountability and coordinated response.
  • Ongoing Monitoring and Refinement: Continuous review of patient safety data, legal trends, and regulatory changes is crucial. Advanced actuarial tools, such as Monte Carlo simulations, help stress-test liability scenarios and optimize capital allocation.

The overarching goal is not merely compliance but enhancing clinical and financial resilience, ensuring that the organization can withstand and adapt to the evolving liability landscape.

Trends Driving Growth in Healthcare Liability Captives

Several factors are fueling the expansion of healthcare captives:

  • Rising insurance premiums and decreasing capacity: Providers seek stable, cost-effective alternatives to traditional markets.
  • Growth in telemedicine and digital health: New liability exposures associated with virtual care are often better managed through captives.
  • Industry consolidation: Mergers create larger risk pools, making captive structures more attractive.
  • Reputational risks: Increased scrutiny and social media influence heighten the need for tailored coverage.
  • Advances in medical technology, including AI: Custom policies are necessary to cover emerging clinical risks.

Joe Rosenberger notes that “as verdicts and premiums continue to rise, healthcare organizations will increasingly turn to captives for better control over their liabilities.” Recent data from Vermont shows a record number of new captive formations in 2024, with healthcare playing a significant role. Globally, reports indicate that casualty premiums—including medical malpractice—have increased substantially, underscoring the sector’s critical role in captive growth.

The continued evolution of risk exposures and market conditions suggests that the strategic use of captives will remain an essential component of healthcare risk management in years to come.

—

For more insights on innovative risk management strategies, explore training the surgeons of tomorrow with virtual reality. Also, understanding key considerations in healthcare technology development is crucial, as detailed in 7 aspects to focus on when creating healthcare software. Lastly, the shift from basic molecules to advanced pharmaceutical visualization is transforming drug development and marketing, explored in from molecules to market the new era of pharmaceutical visualization.